In the green
Going green is good for the bottom line - Business Standard
December 15, 2009
Going green, as a series of feature articles in
this newspaper have shown, is not just good for
the environment, it is good for corporate bottom
lines also. If energy costs form a tenth of all
costs, for instance, then anything which reduces
energy intensity can only be good. The question,
of course, is whether the energy-saving devices
cost so much that they negate the effect of the
annual saving. While most purveyors of
energy-saving equipment say payback periods are
under four years, the companies featured seem to
suggest this is indeed true - some, like ITC,
claim to have delivered extra returns of up to a
fourth to shareholders as a result of various
environment-friendly measures. And these benefits
are without taking into account the possibilities
of tapping into the multi-trillion dollar
opportunity for environmental products and
services that are likely by 2020. Just the likely
environmental credits that Indian industry can
earn on the basis of the 1,400 Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) that has been approved so far, can
earn a little over $6 bn by 2012.
While ITC has always been known for its pioneering
work in the field, this got a fillip with US
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visiting ITC’s
Green Centre in Gurgaon and calling it a "monument
to the future". A little over a decade ago, ITC's
paper business was bleeding and what turned it
around was a greening project over 100,000
hectares involving tribals and small and marginal
farmers - the company gave them saplings for
commercial forestry which helped the environment
(part of this programme is registered as a CDM
project) and aided the bottom line from 15 to 30
per cent. The group as a whole is the only company
of its size to be carbon positive for four years
in a row, water positive for seven years in a row
and solid-waste recycling positive since last
year. Maruti Suzuki India Limited, the country's
largest auto-maker, similarly, has cut electricity
consumption by a fifth between 2000-01 and
2008-09, water consumption by half and, since
2002-03, carbon emissions by 30 per cent. Apart
from what it does to the company's bottom line, it
complements its marketing effort. In a market like
Europe that is increasingly getting fanatic about
the environment, the company's A-Star is the first
out of the country that meets the European
end-of-life vehicle norms since 87 per cent of the
car can be recycled at the time of scrapping; the
rest, according to the company, can be put in
incinerators and used in other forms. Though few
power utilities have gone green, the potential is
large since, as L&T's sustainability report puts
it, a watt saved is worth three watts generated,
taking into account both the large transmission
and distribution losses, apart from the losses due
to the thermal inefficiency of equipment using
this electricity. Few of the smaller units across
the country are looking at going green, but the
ones that have used energy-efficient furnaces or
biomass gasifiers from Teri will testify, this has
reduced costs and increased efficiency. So,
whatever the view on whether Environment Minister
Jairam Ramesh was right to talk of India needing
to take on some non-binding commitments of her own
at the Copenhagen global warming summit, the path
for corporate India is quite clear.